Friday, July 15, 2005

A New Dead Sea Scroll!

A new Dead Sea scroll was found, apparently containing extracts of Leviticus dating to the Bar Kochba revolt. Thanks to Dr. Davila at PaleoJudaica for finding this.
Bedouin wanders across Biblical manuscript

Fragments of a Biblical manuscript dating back to the last Jewish revolt against Roman rule in 135 AD Judaea, have been uncovered near the Dead Sea.

After four decades with a dearth of new finds, archaeologists had resigned themselves to believing the desert caves in the modern-day West Bank had already yielded all their secrets from the Roman era.

"It's simply sensational, a dream come true," archaeology professor Hanan Eshel, a Biblical specialist at Israel's Bar Ilan University, said.

For the past 20 years, he has scoured the Judaean desert around the Dead Sea, overturning stone after stone in search of Biblical parchments.

He has been trumped by Bedouin, who stumbled across the miniature fragments last August.

Only a few centimetres long, the pieces contain extracts in Hebrew from the Biblical Book of Leviticus.

Damaged by bat droppings and lying under a film of dirt in a cave near the Ein Gedi oasis, the Bedouin pocketed the manuscripts and began an arduous bidding process with Professor Eshel.

"Thanks to this find, we now know a little more about the troubled period that gave rise to the Jewish revolt against the Romans," the Professor said.

I wonder if there's anything else written on it, since it isn't the actual text of Leviticus...?

2 Comments:

Blogger Tyler F. Williams said...

The text is a fragment from the book of Leviticus. You can take a look at my blog entries on the new scroll, which I have indexed here:
http://biblical-studies.ca/dss

9:15 PM  
Blogger Chris Weimer said...

Very nicely done! I must say, your reconstruction here is very top-notch.

Also, I noticed at the bottom of the page you mentioned forgery. Such sad times it is when anything biblically related is even hinted at as forgery, even boring Levitical texts not even written so early. I would assume most forgers would have done something extraordinary to the text, such as having it written on stone dated and thrown in an excavation site. ;)

But to the point, well done on the reconstruction.

kindest regards,
Chris

4:58 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home